Analyzing Both Sides of the Conflict Theory Essay

Conflict theory was the maiden radical criminological theory proposed by the scholars in the 1960s (Barkan, p. 254). It specially analyzes the role of interlockings in class, gender, and power in the incidences of crimes in a peculiar(prenominal) society. It tells that these conflicts be the reasons why battalion commit crimes. This specific thought opposes the witness of the consensus theory which perceives crime as any behavior that violates criminal law (Barkan, p. 14). To compare, Conflict theory believes that a crime is far more obscure than the first definition, assuming that battalion do non share the uniform values, beliefs, and dispositions.Because of this, the conflict theory twists one of the theories that are applicable for larger contextual conditions. In fact, the theory encompasses a wide range of areas which makes it divided into sub- categories, much(prenominal) as radical criminology, peacemaking criminology, radical feminism, and left realism. (Greek, 2005). These minoritiesthe poor, Blacks, Hispanics, to name a a few(prenominal)are universe given focus and importance through the theory. Marx and Engels qualify that justice is not attainable and is unfairly being administered to the minorities.Through the conflict theory, an explanation on why minorities get involved with crimes is provided. The theory explains that laws against crimes are do not for the interest of everyone but barely for themselves. Laws are make to serve the interest of the sizeable who knows that their illegal malpractices can only become legal if the laws will be made based on their needs. This made conflict theory sounds more realistic with consensus theory. It has able to portray the paradox with power struggles as a source of crime motives that other theories snub or missed to see.However, proponents of the conflict theory also got blinded and missed to see some of the criticisms regarding the conflict. First of all, it is said that the conflict theory is besides generalized and assuming with its discussion on the implementation of laws in societies. Laws affiliated to the prevention of street crimes such as robbery and murder do not necessarily serve the purpose of the powerful and neglects the less powerful minorities.In fact, such kinds of laws are directed to serve the security of everyone, and not just a little percentage of the people. The theory seems to forget that although people are different in some aspects, they still posses the same characteristics and needs. In this particular situation, all people need security for their lives. The laws protecting peoples lives could not be considered as law protecting only the interests of those who are in power it is also for the benefit of other people.In addition to this criticism, the theory of conflict also shows a weak mooring in terms of labeling disparities. There has been inconsistency in the evidence of such gaps tackling how dominant groups use the law to sup port their personal interests. In this way, the theory, in some ways, lose slightly its credibility.Nevertheless, the greatest strength of the theory is its commodious and radical way of exploring the reason behind crimes in societies. These crimes are deep rooted in the skins of the people who commit them. Although committers of crime are being treated as lowly kind of persons, their condition is being defend by the conflict theory.The theory will simply said that instead of committers, the minorities are victims of a much bigger crime brought about by the powerful groups to them. The theory, instead of prosecuting them, is aiming to reason out their main reason why they have done such crimes. Conflict theory acts like a lawyer who defends a person who has valid reasons behind the crime he committed. The lawyer may lack reliable and consistent evidence to produce the innocence of his client, but still, he believes in the accountability of the person.ReferencesBarkan, S.E. (200 5). Criminology Sociological Understanding. new Jersey Pearson PrenticeHallBartos, J.O. Wehr, P.E. and Paul Wehr. ( 2002). Using Conflict Theory. unfermented York CambridgeUniversity PressGreek, C.E. Criminological Theory. November 2005. Retrieved on 4 June 2008.http//www.criminology.fsu.edu/crimtheory/conflict.htmLenski, G.E. (1966). Power and Privilege A Theory of Social Stratification. McGraw-Hill.